English only
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| demosaicing by frequency selection | alternate projection with bilinear interpolation | alternate projection with template matching |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| demosaicing by frequency selection | alternate projection with bilinear interpolation | alternate projection with template matching |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
| demosaicing by frequency selection | alternate projection with bilinear interpolation | |
 |
||
 |
||
| alternate projection with template matching | ||
| Figure S1: Comparison of demosaicing by frequency selection and two implementations of the alternating projection algorithm [1]. In the first implementation, we use bilinear interpolation as initialization, one level of decomposition, and eight iterations. In the second implementation, we use a template matching method as initialization, one level of decomposition, and eight iteration. For demosaicing by frequency selection, we use for all images the Filter given in Figure 4 (a). | ||